Why is metaphase checkpoint so important




















The cell will only pass the checkpoint if it is an appropriate size and has adequate energy reserves. At this point, the cell also checks for DNA damage. A cell that does not meet all the requirements will not progress to the S phase.

The cell can halt the cycle and attempt to remedy the problematic condition, or the cell can advance into G 0 inactive phase and await further signals when conditions improve. If a cell meets the requirements for the G 1 checkpoint, the cell will enter S phase and begin DNA replication.

This transition, as with all of the major checkpoint transitions in the cell cycle, is signaled by cyclins and cyclin dependent kinases CDKs. Cyclins are cell-signaling molecules that regulate the cell cycle.

The G 2 checkpoint bars entry into the mitotic phase if certain conditions are not met. As with the G 1 checkpoint, cell size and protein reserves are assessed. However, the most important role of the G 2 checkpoint is to ensure that all of the chromosomes have been accurately replicated without mistakes or damage. If the DNA has been correctly replicated, cyclin dependent kinases CDKs signal the beginning of mitotic cell division. The M checkpoint occurs near the end of the metaphase stage of mitosis.

The M checkpoint is also known as the spindle checkpoint because it determines whether all the sister chromatids are correctly attached to the spindle microtubules. Because the separation of the sister chromatids during anaphase is an irreversible step, the cycle will not proceed until the kinetochores of each pair of sister chromatids are firmly anchored to at least two spindle fibers arising from opposite poles of the cell. The cell cycle is controlled by regulator molecules that either promote the process or stop it from progressing.

In addition to the internally controlled checkpoints, there are two groups of intracellular molecules that regulate the cell cycle. These regulatory molecules either promote progress of the cell to the next phase positive regulation or halt the cycle negative regulation.

Regulator molecules may act individually or they can influence the activity or production of other regulatory proteins. Therefore, the failure of a single regulator may have almost no effect on the cell cycle, especially if more than one mechanism controls the same event.

Conversely, the effect of a deficient or non-functioning regulator can be wide-ranging and possibly fatal to the cell if multiple processes are affected.

Two groups of proteins, called cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases Cdks , are responsible for the progress of the cell through the various checkpoints. The levels of the four cyclin proteins fluctuate throughout the cell cycle in a predictable pattern.

Increases in the concentration of cyclin proteins are triggered by both external and internal signals. After the cell moves to the next stage of the cell cycle, the cyclins that were active in the previous stage are degraded.

Cyclin Concentrations at Checkpoints : The concentrations of cyclin proteins change throughout the cell cycle. There is a direct correlation between cyclin accumulation and the three major cell cycle checkpoints.

Also, note the sharp decline of cyclin levels following each checkpoint the transition between phases of the cell cycle as cyclin is degraded by cytoplasmic enzymes. The 53 and 21 designations refer to the functional molecular masses of the proteins p in kilodaltons. Much of what is known about cell cycle regulation comes from research conducted with cells that have lost regulatory control. All three of these regulatory proteins were discovered to be damaged or non-functional in cells that had begun to replicate uncontrollably became cancerous.

In each case, the main cause of the unchecked progress through the cell cycle was a faulty copy of the regulatory protein. Rb, p53, and p21 act primarily at the G 1 checkpoint.

If the DNA cannot be repaired, p53 can trigger apoptosis, or cell suicide, to prevent the duplication of damaged chromosomes. As p53 levels rise, the production of p21 is triggered.

As a cell is exposed to more stress, higher levels of p53 and p21 accumulate, making it less likely that the cell will move into the S phase. Rb exerts its regulatory influence on other positive regulator proteins.

Chiefly, Rb monitors cell size. In the active, dephosphorylated state, Rb binds to proteins called transcription factors, most commonly, E2F Figure 4. As the cell increases in size, Rb is slowly phosphorylated until it becomes inactivated.

Rb releases E2F, which can now turn on the gene that produces the transition protein, and this particular block is removed. Figure 4. Rb halts the cell cycle and releases its hold in response to cell growth. Rb and other proteins that negatively regulate the cell cycle are sometimes called tumor suppressors.

Why do you think the name tumor suppressor might be appropriate for these proteins? Cancer comprises many different diseases caused by a common mechanism: uncontrolled cell growth. Despite the redundancy and overlapping levels of cell cycle control, errors do occur. One of the critical processes monitored by the cell cycle checkpoint surveillance mechanism is the proper replication of DNA during the S phase.

Even when all of the cell cycle controls are fully functional, a small percentage of replication errors mutations will be passed on to the daughter cells. If changes to the DNA nucleotide sequence occur within a coding portion of a gene and are not corrected, a gene mutation results.

All cancers start when a gene mutation gives rise to a faulty protein that plays a key role in cell reproduction. The change in the cell that results from the malformed protein may be minor: perhaps a slight delay in the binding of Cdk to cyclin or an Rb protein that detaches from its target DNA while still phosphorylated.

Even minor mistakes, however, may allow subsequent mistakes to occur more readily. Over and over, small uncorrected errors are passed from the parent cell to the daughter cells and amplified as each generation produces more non-functional proteins from uncorrected DNA damage.

Eventually, the pace of the cell cycle speeds up as the effectiveness of the control and repair mechanisms decreases. The genes that code for the positive cell cycle regulators are called proto-oncogenes.

Proto-oncogenes are normal genes that, when mutated in certain ways, become oncogenes , genes that cause a cell to become cancerous.

Consider what might happen to the cell cycle in a cell with a recently acquired oncogene. In most instances, the alteration of the DNA sequence will result in a less functional or non-functional protein. The result is detrimental to the cell and will likely prevent the cell from completing the cell cycle; however, the organism is not harmed because the mutation will not be carried forward.

If a cell cannot reproduce, the mutation is not propagated and the damage is minimal. Occasionally, however, a gene mutation causes a change that increases the activity of a positive regulator. For example, a mutation that allows Cdk to be activated without being partnered with cyclin could push the cell cycle past a checkpoint before all of the required conditions are met. If the resulting daughter cells are too damaged to undergo further cell divisions, the mutation would not be propagated and no harm would come to the organism.

However, if the atypical daughter cells are able to undergo further cell divisions, subsequent generations of cells will probably accumulate even more mutations, some possibly in additional genes that regulate the cell cycle. The Cdk gene in the above example is only one of many genes that are considered proto-oncogenes. In addition to the cell cycle regulatory proteins, any protein that influences the cycle can be altered in such a way as to override cell cycle checkpoints.

An oncogene is any gene that, when altered, leads to an increase in the rate of cell cycle progression. Aurora C's role at the interchromatid axis is still unknown, but may be related to its role in chromosome condensation Nguyen et al.

The kinase counteracts the establishment of stable, end-on attachments of kinetochores to microtubules, probably in all organisms as part of error correction of tension-less attachments.

It was proposed that in addition to Mad1 and Mad2 Tunquist et al. There is enough evidence in mammalian oocytes excluding an essential role for SAC kinases in CSF arrest, both using conditional knock-out mouse models and expression of dominant negative constructs Tsurumi et al.

This indicates that beyond potential other functions in meiosis II, such as SAC control, Sgo2 localization, and stabilization of kinetochore-microtubule interactions, SAC kinases are not implicated in establishing or maintaining a CSF arrest. The specificities of the meiotic cell division require adaptation of known regulatory mechanisms that govern somatic cell divisions.

Kinases that are important for mitotic SAC control fulfill important additional roles in meiosis, independent of a functional SAC see Table 1 for a summary of the different roles SAC kinases play in meiosis. Well-known model organisms such as mouse, yeast and Drosophila , emerging model systems, and comparative evolutionary studies will help us to obtain a better picture of the multiple steps regulated by these kinases.

Importantly, even though the result of meiosis is the same in all models the generation of haploid cells , details in the molecular pathways ensuring the correct segregation of chromosomes and sister chromatids may vary.

These differences provide key insight that will help us understand the essential parts and targets of each pathway for the generation of euploid gametes.

KW has written most of the part of this review dealing with meiosis in higher organisms, and AM has written most of the part on meiosis in yeast. Both authors have corrected the whole manuscript. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer DF declared a shared affiliation, with no collaboration, with one of the authors, KW, to the handling Editor. Casein kinase 1 coordinates cohesin cleavage, gametogenesis, and exit from M phase in meiosis II.

Cell 40, 37— Asghar, A. Bub1 autophosphorylation feeds back to regulate kinetochore docking and promote localized substrate phosphorylation. Synchronized meiosis and recombination in fission yeast: observations with pat diploid cells. Balboula, A. Selective disruption of aurora C kinase reveals distinct functions from aurora B kinase during meiosis in mouse oocytes. PLoS Genet. Batiha, O. Evidence that the spindle assembly checkpoint does not regulate APC Fzy activity in Drosophila female meiosis.

Genome 55, 63— Bernard, P. Fission yeast Bub1 is essential in setting up the meiotic pattern of chromosome segregation. Cell Biol. Brar, G. Rec8 phosphorylation and recombination promote the step-wise loss of cohesins in meiosis. Nature , — Buffin, E. Flies without a spindle checkpoint. Carlile, T. Meiosis I is established through division-specific translational control of a cyclin.

Cell , — Cheslock, P. Chia, M. Temporal expression of a master regulator drives synchronous sporulation in budding yeast. G3 6, — Chiang, T. Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes. Ciliberto, A. Cell cycle: micromanaging checkpoint proteins.

Elife 6:e Cipak, L. ATP analog-sensitive Pat1 protein kinase for synchronous fission yeast meiosis at physiological temperature.

Cell Cycle 11, — Collin, P. The spindle assembly checkpoint works like a rheostat rather than a toggle switch. Dobles, M. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2.

El Yakoubi, W. Mps1 kinase-dependent Sgo2 centromere localisation mediates cohesin protection in mouse oocyte meiosis I. Meiotic divisions: no place for gender equality. Fernius, J. Bub1 kinase targets Sgo1 to ensure efficient chromosome biorientation in budding yeast mitosis. Fraschini, R. Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores. EMBO J. Gilliland, W.

The meiotic defects of mutants in the Drosophila mps1 gene reveal a critical role of Mps1 in the segregation of achiasmate homologs. Goldstein, L. Kinetochore structure and its role in chromosome orientation during the first meiotic division in male D. Cell 25, — Gorbsky, G. The spindle checkpoint and chromosome segregation in meiosis. FEBS J. Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase.

Gui, L. Spindle assembly checkpoint signalling is uncoupled from chromosomal position in mouse oocytes. Development , , — Gurden, M. Aurora B prevents premature removal of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins from the kinetochore: a key role for aurora B in mitosis. Google Scholar. Hached, K. Mps1 at kinetochores is essential for female mouse meiosis Development , — Hassold, T. To err meiotically is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy.

Maternal age and chromosomally abnormal pregnancies: what we know and what we wish we knew. Hauf, S. Aurora controls sister kinetochore mono-orientation and homolog bi-orientation in meiosis-I. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2.

PLoS Biol. He, E. System-level feedbacks make the anaphase switch irreversible. He, X. Mph1, a member of the Mps1-like family of dual specificity protein kinases, is required for the spindle checkpoint in S. Cell Sci. PubMed Abstract Google Scholar. Herbert, M. Homologue disjunction in mouse oocytes requires proteolysis of securin and cyclin B1.

Homer, H. Mad2 is required for inhibiting securin and cyclin B degradation following spindle depolymerisation in meiosis I mouse oocytes. Reproduction , — A spindle assembly checkpoint protein functions in prophase I arrest and prometaphase progression. Science , — Hoyt, M. Cell 66, — Hunter, N. Meiotic recombination: the essence of heredity. Cold Spring Harb. Ishiguro, T. Shugoshin-PP2A counteracts casein-kinasedependent cleavage of Rec8 by separase.

Jessberger, R. Age-related aneuploidy through cohesion exhaustion. EMBO Rep. Jonak, K. Cell Cycle 16, — Jones, K. Molecular causes of aneuploidy in mammalian eggs. Development , — Jordan, P. Genes Dev. Kakui, Y. A novel fission yeast mei4 mutant that allows efficient synchronization of telomere dispersal and the first meiotic division.

Yeast 28, — Kalantzaki, M. Kinetochore-microtubule error correction is driven by differentially regulated interaction modes. Kalitsis, P. Bub3 gene disruption in mice reveals essential mitotic spindle checkpoint function during early embryogenesis. Kamenz, J.

Slow checkpoint activation kinetics as a safety device in anaphase. Katis, V. Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore-associated protein related to MEI-S Rec8 phosphorylation by casein kinase 1 and Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase regulates cohesin cleavage by separase during meiosis. Kawashima, S. Shugoshin enables tension-generating attachment of kinetochores by loading Aurora to centromeres.

Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Khodjakov, A. Centromere tension: a divisive issue. Kiburz, B. The core centromere and Sgo1 establish a kb cohesin-protected domain around centromeres during meiosis I.

Kim, S. Dual mechanisms prevent premature chromosome segregation during meiosis. Kitajima, T. Human Bub1 defines the persistent cohesion site along the mitotic chromosome by affecting Shugoshin localization. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Complete kinetochore tracking reveals error-prone homologous chromosome biorientation in mammalian oocytes.

Shugoshin collaborates with protein phosphatase 2A to protect cohesin. Nature , 46— Krenn, V. The aurora B kinase in chromosome bi-orientation and spindle checkpoint signaling. This page has been archived and is no longer updated. Metaphase is the third phase of mitosis, the process that separates duplicated genetic material carried in the nucleus of a parent cell into two identical daughter cells. During metaphase, the cell's chromosomes align themselves in the middle of the cell through a type of cellular "tug of war.

Prior to metaphase, protein formations called kinetochores formed around the centromere.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000